Show Less

Metaphor and Masculinity in Hosea


Susan E. Haddox

The metaphors in Hosea are rich and varied, comprising both gendered and non-gendered image fields. This book examines the use of metaphor in Hosea through the lens of masculinity studies, which provides a means to elucidate connections between the images and to analyze their cumulative rhetorical effect. The rhetoric of both the gendered and non-gendered imagery is analyzed using a model from cognitive anthropology, which divides social space along three axes: activity, potency, and goodness. People use metaphors to position and to move one another within this space. These axes reveal how the metaphors in Hosea rhetorically relate the audience, represented by Ephraim/Israel, and YHWH to a particular construction of masculinity. Hosea uses the imagery of Assyrian treaty curses to reinforce YHWH’s masculinity and dominance, while undermining the masculinity of the audience. The rhetoric of the text attempts to bring the audience into an appropriately subordinate position with respect to YHWH and to shape its members’ actions and attitudes accordingly.


Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Bibliography 221


BIBLIOGRAPHY Aaron, David H. Biblical Ambiguities: Metaphor, Semantics and Divine Imagery. Brill Reference Library of Ancient Judaism 4. Leiden: Brill, 2001. Abma, Richtsje. ―Bonds of Love‖: Methodic Studies of Prophetic Texts with Marriage Imagery. Studia semitica neerlandica. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1999. Ackerman, Susan. ―The Personal is Political: Covenantal and Affectionate Love (bha, hbha) in the Hebrew Bible.‖ Vetus Testamentum 52 (2002): 437–58. Albertz, Rainer. From the Beginnings to the End of the Monarchy. Vol. 1 of A History of Israelite Religion in the Old Testament Period. Translated by John Bowden. Old Testament Library. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 1994. Alter, Robert. The Art of Biblical Narrative. New York: Basic Books, 1981. ———. ―From Line to Story in Biblical Verse.‖ Poetics Today 4 (1983): 615–37. Andersen, Francis I., and David Noel Freedman. Hosea. Anchor Bible 24. New York: Doubleday, 1980. Aristotle. The ―Art‖ of Rhetoric. Translated by John Henry Freese. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1926. ———. The Poetics. Translated by W. Hamilton Fyfe. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1927. Bailey, Randall. ―They‘re Nothing but Incestuous Bastards.‖ Pages 121–38 in Social Location and Biblical Interpretation in the United States. Vol. 1 of Reading from This Place. Edited by Fernando F. Segovia and Mary Ann Tolbert. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1995. Bal, Mieke. Death and Dissymmetry: The Politics of Coherence in the Book of Judges. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988. Barré, Michael L. ―New Light on the Interpretation of Hosea VI 2.‖ Vetus Testamentum 28 (1978): 129–41....

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.