Voluntary Sustainability Standards
Illusions of Progress and a Way Forward
Table Of Contents
- Advance Praise
- About the authors
- About the book
- This eBook can be cited
- List of Figures, Tables and Boxes
- I. Sustainability Standards, Their Systems, Role and Impact
- A. The Taxonomy of Sustainability Standards
- B. The Ambivalent Antecedents of Voluntary Sustainability Standards (VSS)
- C. Opportunities and Benefits that Could Arise from VSS
- D. The Impact of VSS and the Insufficient Leverage for Transformational Change
- E. The Limitations and Cons of VSS
- 1. Transparency, Openness and Conflict of Interests
- 2. VSS as International Standards and the Problem of Sufficient Local Flexibility
- 3. Inclusion or Exclusion: Can VSS Really Work for Smallholder Farmers?
- F. Can VSS-Governed Sustainability Markets Really be Mainstreamed and Graduate from Current Market Niches?
- G. ‘Organic’ – A Standard with a Different Touch
- 1. Evolution of ‘Organic’
- 2. What Makes ‘Organic’ Special?
- 3. Basic Differences between ‘Organic’ and ‘Other VSS’
- 4. The Commercial Success Leads to Capitalistic Competition
- 5. Inherent Contradictions
- 6. Certification
- 7. Conclusion
- II. VSS at a Crossroads
- A. What Are the Key Market Challenges, What Can VSS Realistically Deliver and Where Must They Fail?
- 1. The Asymmetrical Market Power along the Supply Chain
- 2. The Race to the Bottom
- 3. Limited Control over a Range of Essential Flanking and Supportive Elements for VSS
- 4. The Myth of Yield Increases
- 5. Economic and Social Sustainability Remain Illusionary without Reforming the International Commodity Price-Fixing System
- 6. Summing up
- III Is There Any Future Perspective for VSS and What Might It Look Like?
- A. Rebalancing Power in Global Agri-food Supply Chains
- 1. Restoration of National Supply Management: State or Producer Organization Driven
- 2. Strengthening and Changing the Focus of Competition Policy
- 3. Reducing the Abuse of Power: Limiting the Use of Restrictive Business and Trading Practices
- 4. Legislation on due Diligence for Avoiding Precarious Employment Conditions, Infringement of Human Rights, and Environmental Damage
- B. International Coordination and Supply Management
- 1. The Concept of International Commodity-Related Environment Agreements
- C. Lifting the Bar of Sustainability Performance: How Can VSS Play a Constructive Role in the Future?
- 1. Is the Constructive Use of VSS in the European Union’s Generalised Scheme of Preference (GSP) an Option?
- 2. The Complementary Role of VSS to Regulation on Key Sustainability Issues
- D. Epidemics and VSS: A Relationship that Is None
- E. To Sum up
- List of Acronyms
- Explanations of Some Technical Terms
Figures, Tables and Boxes
←ix | x→
As neoliberal paradigms reached their climax in the 1990s and early 2000s, new narratives emerged in trade debates arguing that international supply chains would play a pivotal role in promoting global trade and economic growth. These narratives suggested that opening up the economies was not only desirable but the only way to have a meaningful participation in the world economy. Moreover, they also predicted that the intensified interdependency in international production relationships inevitably implied greater mutual policy dependency, a de-territorialization of production that called for a diminishing role of national macro-economic policy and the need of a common policy framework. Under this paradigm, less policy space will be left for countries to establish policy frameworks adapted to their needs and conditions. Instead, businesses themselves would set the rules, such as through voluntary sustainability standards that would eventually make supply chains more environmentally, socially and economically sustainable.
As discussed in this book, the reliance on businesses self-designed sustainability standards has been far from delivering the promised results. In many cases, such standards brought about market distortions or were overambitious or naïve and, ultimately, ineffective. Thus, in many agro-food sectors, the increasing use of sustainability standards de facto became a ‘license to operate’ that excluded ←xi | xii→certain producers from the market. In addition, despite the soaring market share of standard-compliant products, the key sustainability problems in related production and markets have neither been overcome nor significantly reduced. This ranges from deforestation and biodiversity loss, over child labour or modern slavery in social terms, to insufficient living income and wages.
There is every evidence that voluntary sustainability standards are at a crossroads. If business as usual continuous and there is a growing perception that these standards mostly boil down to greenwashing, consumers may get disillusioned on the claim that by buying certified products they can shop their way to a better world.
It is also of central importance to consider the extent to which producers, particularly in developing countries, actually benefit from those standards. Are certified products not only more environmentally suitable, but also socially and economically remunerative for producers? The analysis in this book casts considerable doubt on this. Even for sustainability standards, such as organic agriculture and fair trade, additional income gains have been modest or outright disappointing; a decent living income for farmers and farm workers continues to remain out of reach.
Moreover, while some voluntary standard programs strengthen capacity building on management and agronomic skills, the compliance with most sustainability standards requires significant investment for adjusting production and conducting conformity assessment. There is stiff competition among producers to be standard-compliant in the most cost-effective way, implying that small-scale producers get marginalized. There is, in fact, an increasing perception among producers and exporters in developing countries that sustainability standards are imposed on them with a logic and justification based on Northern preferences and conditions, fuelling the impression that a good number of these standards border on technical barriers to trade.
The claims made that voluntary sustainability standards might not only achieve the targeted sustainability goals but also self-cure some of the key systemic market flaws have turned out to be wishful thinking. The internalization of economic, social and environmental costs has not happened and in most agro-food sectors producers are faced with an even higher power asymmetry in global supply chains.
After more than three decades of increasing use of sustainability standards, a fact-based stocktaking and sober-minded analysis of their real sustainability impact was long overdue. The question is not only what was their impact but whether private sustainability standards can be made fit for a very challenging ←xii | xiii→future with far-going transformations in production and consumption patterns and, particularly whether they can be more, truly sustainable. And this is unlikely to occur, as the authors conclude, without far better development and income prospects for farmers.
This book addresses these and other issues based on a thorough analysis and well-defined conceptual framework. Importantly, it not only examines the past but constructively explores whether there is a future for voluntary sustainability standards. After almost 30 years in which they have brought about more illusion than reality, it is time to rethink the role of such standards and how sustainability objectives can actually be reached.
Dr Carlos María Correa
Executive Director, South Center, Geneva
- XVIII, 146
- ISBN (PDF)
- ISBN (ePUB)
- ISBN (MOBI)
- ISBN (Hardcover)
- Publication date
- 2021 (October)
- New York, Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles, Oxford, Wien, 2021. XVIII, 146 pp., 8 b/w ill., 2 tables.