Marx, Foucault, Neo-Zapatismo
Chapter Three: (More) Marxist Teachings: The Power(s) of Money Capital, the Impotence of Political and State Power(s)
Political power as such will no longer exist, for political power is precisely the official expression of class antagonism within civil society.
Karl Marx, The Poverty of Philosophy, 1847
As Marx has brilliantly and incisively explained in many of his texts, we must view modern bourgeois society, through the long-term perspective of human evolution as a whole, as a clear “point of historical transition.” That is, as a society that shares and recreates a set of features common to all societies in this ongoing “human pre-history,” while also remaining unique. Radically different than all of its predecessors, modern bourgeois society both affirms and develops (albeit in a potential and, for now, contradictory and antithetical way) a series of premises for and elements of what the eventual, approaching communist society will be. This future communist society will mark the beginning of true human history.1
A dense synthesis of heterogeneous, even contrary features, modern bourgeois society is linked to all prior classist and even prehistoric societies. At the same time, Marx also portrays it in all its singularity and associates it with the post-capitalist, post-classist, post-prehistoric society of the imminent future. He also defines the characteristics that imbue social power overall, other forms of powers, and especially capitalist political power with their different constitutive strata and levels. Let’s review all of these ideas carefully.←45 | 46→
First, Marx insists on the idea that bourgeois, capitalist modern society is the final expression (and thus the...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.