Problems, Politics, and Possibilities
Chapter II: Is It (Still) Useful to Think About Classroom Discipline as Control? An Examination of the ‘Problem of Discipline’ - Zsuzsa Millei 13
13Chapter II Chapter II Introduction The verb ‘discipline’ in classroom discipline approaches is understood predominantly in functionalist terms as a form of regulation or control to create and maintain order (Slee, 1995). Power associated with ideas of regulation and control in this context is thought about in structuralist terms, which is possessed and represents a powerful will over the powerless. In this chapter ﬁrst I make a case that this way of thinking about discipline constructs a central problem that I term in this chapter the ‘problem of discipline’. This problem is identiﬁed by all approaches of classroom discipline, and they all attempt to address and overcome this problem. The ‘problem of discipline’ revolves around the opposing ideas of students’ freedom/autonomy versus teachers’ dominance/control that constructs an axis between maximum freedom and maximum control according to the ‘personal power’ the teacher exerts and the ‘personal power’ the students have (Porter, 2007). In this way, laissez-faire approaches to discipline are located on the maximum freedom end, while autocratic approaches on the opposite end (for a graph look at Porter, 2007, p. 19). Other approaches are also lined up on this axis according to the level of freedom they allow for students as well as the teacher control they carry. With the strong entrenchment of the prospects of democracy, social justice and rights, those approaches are considered as more desirable that endow students with autonomy and freedom. Drawing on students’ rational autonomy, self-regulation seems to be the key to students’ freedom...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.