The Case of William Tyndale and the 1533 English "Enchiridion Militis Christiani</I>
8 A Test of Authorship 71
C H A P T E R 8 A Test of Authorship If there is a clear, predictable pattern of subjunctive use preference in the works of a particular author as has been demonstrated in the previous chap- ter, that pattern should be employable in determining authorship. As Susan Hockey writes, “whether or not linguistic habits are measurable […] is itself debatable, but various projects have shown that it is possible to characterize an author or a set of texts by linguistic fingerprints” (104). Hockey reviews several studies which attempt to employ linguistic fingerprints in the deter- mination of authorship. The most prominent include reviews of the Pauline texts and Shakespearean authorship (Hockey 119-123). Most of the studies reviewed by Hockey involve statistical analysis based on data produced by concordancer software such as word length, words per sentence, etc. Would it be possible to add a test of subjunctive preference to the list of reliable tests of style and authorship? To answer this question, a text of unknown or disputed authorship must be identified to compare with the results of the Tyndale study. 8.1 Enchiridion Militis Christiani Erasmus of Rotterdam wrote the text commonly called the Enchiridion in 1501. First written in Latin, it was meant to be a ‘handbook’ for the Chris- tian in his daily walk, hence the name. Daniell writes, “In his Enchiridion, Erasmus gives defenses by which the Christian could prepare himself for the inevitable encounters with the world and the Devil” (1994:64). It is also...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.