Tracing the Changes in Presidential Address and Power
III. EXCAVATING THE BULLY PULPIT: THE FOUNDATION AND EVOLUTION OF POLICY PROPOSAL 107
CHAPTER III Excavating the Bully Pulpit: The Foundation and Evolution of Policy Proposal Leaders are visionaries with a poorly developed sense of fear and no concept of the odds against them...they make things happen. —Thomas Jefferson If he [the President] speaks to Congress, it must be in the language of truth. —Andrew Jackson NEWLY ELECTED presidents often claim that they have a mandate from the people of the United States as a result of their victory (Kelly, 1983). They then use this mandate to propose the policies and push the agendas of their administration. However, as was referred to in previous chapters, the inter- pretation of presidential history that presents a “traditional” and “modern” way of doing things suggests that only recently has the executive actively pursued his own policy agenda and discarded the trappings of constitutional constraint for the freedom to pursue his own goals. However, as this chapter explains, this characterization of political activity may tend to overlook im- portant nuances in presidential policy proposal and behavior and may assume a presidential pacifism of the 18th and 19th that is not completely supported. As an example, when Andrew Jackson succeeded John Quincy Adams to the office of the presidency of the United States in 1828, he entered the posi- tion on the heels of some of the most partisan and assumedly corrupt politics in a presidential election that the nation had seen. Only four years earlier, The Evolutionary Rhetorical Presidency 108 Jackson had lost the presidential election, not...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.