Show Less

Philosophical Profiles in the Theory of Communication

With a Foreword by Richard J. Bernstein and an Afterword by John Durham Peters

Edited By Jason Hannan

Philosophical Profiles in the Theory of Communication is the first book to draw systematic attention to the theme of communication in twentieth-century academic philosophy. It covers a broad range of philosophical perspectives on communication, including those from analytic philosophy, pragmatism, critical theory, phenomenology, hermeneutics, feminism, psychoanalysis, systems theory, and more. What emerges is a vital, long-neglected story about the theme of communication in late modern academic philosophy. Each chapter features a «profile» of a particular philosophical figure, with a brief intellectual biography, an overview of that figure’s contribution to communication theory, and a critical assessment of the significance of that contribution. The clear and accessible organization of the volume makes it ideal for courses in both philosophy and communication studies.

Prices

Show Summary Details
Restricted access

11 Sandra Harding: The Less False Accounts of Feminist Standpoint Epistemology LINDA STEINER 261

Extract

11 Sandra Harding The Less False Accounts of Feminist Standpoint Epistemology LINDA STEINER ________________________________________ Sandra Harding’s work in feminist epistemology, postcolonial theory, the philosophy of science, and research methodology is highly regarded across many disparate disciplines for clarifying the inherently value-laden and political dimensions of knowledge, including scholarship. Harding is most known for articulating principles of feminist standpoint epistemology (FSE), one of “the most controversial theories in the history of second wave feminism thinking.”1 She played a key role in bringing into being standpoint epistemology as a general class of feminist theory; standpoint theorists became identifiable as a group through her work.2 She has led the way in showing how and why knowledge claims may sometimes even have life-and-death consequences, and thus why, in a very practical way, it matters who is making which knowledge claims. Some details in the elaboration and defense of this political and social epistemology have evolved over the last fifteen years. Harding herself describes both standpoint theory and other feminist epistemological projects as dynamic, having developed “within, against, and in interaction with other disciplinary, theoretical, research, and political projects.”3 Yet, she has not backed away from her central claims. It is also worth noting by way of introduction that antiobjectivism has a long history in philosophy. Critiques of positivism and objectivism have been articulated by many philosophers, including many men and non- feminists and including several philosophers discussed in this volume, such as Richard Bernstein, who has compellingly described the objectivism versus 262 | Linda...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.