Late Modernism, Minimalism, and Silence in the Work of Samuel Beckett
3. THE ABSTRACT, THE INCESSANT, THE NEUTRAL
Beckett l’Abstracteur The critical literature on Beckett is simply too vast to engage with or even summarize in the space of this chapter, which seeks to assess the role of silence in Beckett’s work (as exemplary of a particular strand of late modernism). One relatively recent book that has introduced a new element, or at least a new emphasis, into the criticism (one, that is, not relating simply to fashions in critical discourse itself or the sheer mania of criticism around the centenary) is Beckett l’abstracteur by Pascale Casanova (1997). Casanova’s book certainly sits on the French side of the divide in Beckett criticism, and her main object of attack is a strand of criticism deriving from Maurice Blanchot’s “Où main- tenant? Qui maintenant?” of 1953, as well as (French) critical associations of Beckett with Sartrean existentialism or with Ionesco and the “theater of the absurd.” On the contrary, argues Casanova, “[f]ar from being frozen in the bombast consubstantial with the rhetoric of Being, Beckett more than anyone else was concerned with aesthetic modernity.”1 By focusing on his late works, especially Worstward Ho (1983), Casanova shows with some force that Beckett’s “project of a genuinely autonomous literature, freed from the imperatives of representation and respecting the principle of a combinatory of THE ABSTRACT, THE INCESSANT, THE NEUTRAL · 3 · 106 silence nowhen elements that has broken virtually any link with reality (or the conventions thought to represent reality),2 and the elaboration of a novel literary syntax, are on...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.