Edited By Leslie Boldt, Corrado Federici and Ernesto Virgulti
Part II. Political and Cultural Silencing
5. Cartographic Silences in Brian Friel’s Translations Matthew Dwight Moore The psychosocial spatial process commonly known as cognitive mapping appears to be largely innate to our species. Of course, evidence of way- finding behavior, such as identifying landmarks and retro-navigating, is found in many animals, namely in migratory birds, fish, and mammals, not to mention many insects such as butterflies, bees, and ants. To be sure, even plants that grow in the direction of the sun can be said to be way-finding creatures on a certain level. Unlike any other species, however, people make maps. Humans typically “think” spatially as well. And this spatial thinking is imprinted by our own subjective experiences as individuals and members of culture. On the one hand, mental maps that purport to represent a version of the external physical world are accurate in that they do just that. They represent the basic composition and arrangement of shapes, figures, and other visual symbols in order to refer meaningfully to a portion of the world. They are inaccurate for at least three reasons: 1) the map-maker’s limited expressive abilities, 2) the exclusion of information that is intrinsic to any map-making venture, and 3) the invalidation of subjugated knowledge resulting from the legitimation of epistemological hierarchies. Perhaps the most obvious inac- curacy of mental maps is due to the technical or artistic inability of the map- maker to realize fully what they may imagine or remember. Insofar as these mental maps exclude information in order to fit the...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.