Public Notice and the World Wide Web
With the onset of social media, government as well as personal information can be accessed at a push of a button for all to see. This book addresses the kinds of changes that public notice and published public records have experienced as governments around the world try to accommodate the digital formats for information and World Wide Web publishing, as well as presenting historical and legal underpinnings for the broader claim of a public requirement to be informed about government.
While there is concern that government information on the web will fall pray to pranks and misuse, the author argues that it is possible to reduce this risk by looking carefully at the intent of public notice and the history of democratic evolution. The book concludes with recommendations for smoothing the transition from a paper-based world of records to an environment of speed and virtual portability.
Chapter 3: Modern Legal Definitions of Public Notice
· 3 · modern legal definitions of public notice Public notice as a social concept has been with us for centuries, but public no- tice as defined in law, sometimes referred to as legal notice or legal advertising, has had a somewhat shorter history. This chapter will highlight some of the principles and uses of public notice as a legal construct. Many of the early uses by government of public notice come through common law case notes.121 As John Rayner noted in his thorough work on libel laws of England, “Common law is common reason…not thereby that common reason wherewith a man is naturally endued, but that perfection of reason which is gotten by long and continual study.”122 Among the eigh- teenth-century references to public notice is a complaint about newspapers disseminating misinformation in the name of authority.123 But perhaps more important was the legal assertion that government should keep public records, and that they would be available for inspection for any reason at all.124 The legal assertion in these cases is that the government should, of course, keep records, and that those records should be available to anyone who needs to consult them. But these court opinions do not assert that it is the responsibility of the government to bring those records to the attention of anyone who might be affected by what the documents contain. That notion of providing information directly to the citizens, as a legal requirement of 42 social media and participatory democracy the community, is...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.