Show Less

Organizational Listening

The Missing Essential in Public Communication

Jim Macnamara

Organizations, which are central in contemporary industrialized and post-industrial societies, including government departments and agencies, corporations, and non-government organizations, claim to want and practice two-way communication, dialogue, and engagement with citizens, customers, employees, and other stakeholders and publics. But do they in reality? Voice – speaking up – is recognized as fundamental for democracy, representation, and social equity. But what if governments, corporations, institutions, and NGOs are not listening? This book reports the findings of a two-year, three-continent study that show that public and private sector organizations devote substantial and sometimes massive resources to construct an ‘architecture of speaking’ through advertising, PR, and other public communication practices, but listen poorly, sporadically, and sometimes not at all. Beyond identifying a ‘crisis of listening’ in modern societies, this landmark study proposes and describes how organizations need to create an architecture of listening to regain trust and re-engage people whose voices are unheard or ignored. It presents a compelling case to show that urgent attention to organizational listening is essential for maintaining healthy democracy, organization legitimacy, business sustainability, and social equity. This research is essential reading for all scholars, students, and practitioners involved in politics; government, corporate, marketing, and organizational communication; public relations; and all those interested in democratic participation, media, and society.


Show Summary Details
Restricted access



Aarts, N. (2009). Een gesprek zonder einde [A never ending conversation]. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Vosspuspers. Aarts, N., & Van Woerkum, C. (2008). Strategische communicatie [Strategic communication]. Assen, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum. Abelson, J., Forest, P., Eyles, J., Smith, P., Martin, E., & Gauvin, F. (2001, June). Deliberations about deliberation: Issues in the design and evaluation of public consultation processes. Research working paper 01–04. Ottawa, ON: McMaster University Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis. Aberbach, J., & Rockman, B. (1994). Civil servants and policymakers: Neutral or responsive competence? Governance, 7(4), 461–469. Abercrombie, N., & Longhurst, B. (1998). Audiences: A sociological theory of performance and imagination. London, UK: Sage. Adams, A., & McCorkindale, T. (2013). Dialogue and transparency: A content analysis of how the 2012 presidential candidates used Twitter. Public Relations Review, 39(4), 357–359. Adler, R., & Rodman, G. (2011). Understanding communication (11th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Adler, R., Rodman, G., & du Pré, A. (2013). Understanding communication (12th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. AFSC (American Friends Service Committee) & Rustin, B. (1955). Speak truth to power: A Quaker search for an alternative to violence. Philadelphia, PA: Author. Retrieved from 324 organizational listening Akhtar, O. (2014, June 20). Social@Ogilvy partners with Sysomos to offer social media mon- itoring and analytics for campaigns. The Hub. Retrieved from http://www.thehubcomms. com/socialogilvy-partners-with-sysomos-to-offer-social-media-monitoring-and-analyt- ics-for-campaigns/article/357012 Alberts, J., Nakayama, T., & Martin, J. (2007). Human communication in society. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall. AMEC [Association for Measurement and Evaluation]. (2015, March 24)...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.