A Case Study of a National Arts Education Partnership
Chapter 8. Additional Comments
· 8 · additional comments At the end of the interviews, participants were invited to provide addi- tional comments. Each of the partner groups—artists, teachers, and project coordinators—provided a different thrust in their final comments (refer to appendix 6, pp. 136–137). The artists focused on the value of the artistic process within the program; the teachers focused on learner-centeredness; and the project coordinators focused on the importance of community involvement. Artist Comments In their closing comments, the artists highlighted the importance of learning artistic processes to the personal growth and development of young people in schools. Traditionally, the focus in arts instruction has been on the creation of an artistic product (e.g., poem, composition, play, etc.). In the view of the artists, process rather than product was the principal benefit of the arts proj- ects to the students. 72 a case study of a national arts education partnership Artist Schools are looking for a performance but arts learning is a process. The main thing is the process—what the students are learning. Pierre Honegger and Henrietta Honegger Artist You go to another school and a whole different set of politics and dynamics in the arts will happen … I like that the project can take a variety of forms and a variety of schedules, and there is interaction that happens before the project commences. It’s about process and communication. Nerene Ives and Lesley Wolf Artist If you are working in a nuts-and-bolts world, if you’re a widget among many widgets,...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.