Visuality, Postcoloniality, Ethnicity, Sexuality
Chapter Four. Rey Chow’s Method and the Orientations of Cultural Studies
Rey Chow’s method is always surprising, unexpected, revelatory; involving unpredictable connections, to produce illuminating results. But she has not, to date, spent a great deal of time discussing the whys and wherefores of her method. It is clearly connected to cultural theory and to cultural studies. It is clearly derived from an ethics of rigorous yet sensitive reading. And it clearly involves some kind of sophisticated understanding or implicit argument about the stakes and consequences of knowledge production in and as culture and politics. But what are the features and characteristics of these often tacit orientations?
In what follows, I want to try to amplify what I believe are some of the stakes and understandings that inform Chow’s methodological orientations. I will do so in a perhaps unexpected manner: I will first turn from a direct focus on Rey Chow’s work and instead reflect on the questions of research, pedagogy and politics in cultural studies—questions which I hope will both cast new light on the hows, whys and wherefores of an approach such as Chow’s, whilst also allowing us to broach further aspects of Chow’s work in the next chapter.
To begin, let us pause to consider the current ways in which we may think about pedagogy, about teaching and learning, research, academic work in general, and the place and purpose of the university in society. It is worthwhile to do so because—as well as being an important matter in its own right—such...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.