Participatory Pedagogy, Interactive Learning, and Web 2.0
8. Microblogging in the Classroom
MICROBLOGGING IN THE CLASSROOM
With the social media platform and microblog Twitter, users have 140 characters to communicate individual messages, called tweets. Conventional media observer and author Marshall McLuhan coined the phrase “the medium is the message”16 in his book of a similar but not identical title, The Medium Is the Massage. (The typo in the book’s title is the result, ostensibly, of a printing error.) It follows then, using the wisdom of McLuhan, that the medium Twitter is a message: 140 characters of message. Because this message is communicated in the classroom, it is an instructional medium, and the medium/message should be one of substance, one that is relevant. But it seems that any medium, or tool, that allows for only 140 characters of expression at a given time would not provide for a worthwhile exchange of ideas in the classroom. If relevant and meaningful discourse is measured by numbers of characters, words, or sentences, then microblogs could not support relevant and meaningful discourse. Microblogs limit discourse. They are, after all, micro. So let us ask this: Can Twitter and other microblogs be relevant in classroom instruction, despite their inherent and obvious limitation on discourse?
A serious educator would put forward that the message brevity inherent in Twitter is indeed a limitation that undermines the communication of message. Serious educators want students to express themselves in full sentences, with proper grammar and adherence to the rules of punctuation. With 140 ← 73...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.