Show Less
Restricted access

Sanskrit Debate

Vasubandhu’s "Vīmśatikā</I> versus Kumārila’s "Nirālambanavāda</I>

Series:

William Cully Allen

Sanskrit Debate: Vasubandhu’s ‘Vīmśatikā’ versus Kumārila’s ‘Nirālambanavāda’ illustrates the rules and regulations of classical Indian debate literature (pramānaśāstra) by introducing new translations of two Sanskrit texts composed in antithesis to each other’s tradition of thought and practice. In the third century CE, Vasubandhu, a Buddhist philosopher-monk, proposed that the entire world of lived experience is a matter of mind only through his Vīmśatikā (Twenty Verses). In the seventh century CE, Kumārila, a Hindu philosopher-priest, composed Nirālambanavāda (Non-Sensory Limit Debate) to establish the objective reality of objects by refuting Vasubandhu’s claim that objects experienced in waking life are not different from objects experienced in dreams. Kumārila rigorously employs formal rules and regulations of Indian logic and debate to demonstrate that Vasubandhu’s assertion is totally irrational and incoherent.
Vīmśatikā ranks among the world’s most misunderstood texts but Kumārila’s historic refutation allows Vīmśatikā to be read in its own text-historical context. This compelling, radically revolutionary re-reading of Vīmśatikā delineates a hermeneutic of humor indispensable to discerning its medicinal message. In Vīmśatikā, Vasubandhu employs the form of professional Sanskrit logic and debate as a guise and a ruse to ridicule the entire enterprise of Indian philosophy. Vasubandhu critiques all Indian theories of epistemology and ontology and claims that both how we know and what we know are acts of the imagination.
Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Series Index

Extract

South Asian Literature, Arts, and Culture Studies

South Asian Literature, Arts, and Culture Studies especially focuses on the Indian subcontinent, particularly India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Burma, and the diaspora of non-resident South Asians throughout the world. The series invites submissions from scholars working in the field of South Asian studies, with a particular interest in literature, the arts (print and film), politics, religion, and society. The series also welcomes a variety of approaches and theories—especially postcolonial, feminist, post-structural, new historical, psychological, Marxist, and structuralist approaches— that interrogate and explore aspects and elements of South Asian thought, life, and artistic production. The series does not only focus on the contemporary, but also—in special cases—on the ancient or classical studies. Scholars working in related fields, such as philosophy, hermeneutics, and social theory, with a major interest in how these disciplines relate to South Asian studies, are also invited to contribute manuscripts.

For additional information about the series or for the submission of manuscripts, please contact:

Dr. Moumin Quazi Tarleton State University Department of English and Languages Box T-0300 Stephenville, TX 76402 Email: quazi@tarleton.edu

To order other books in this series, please contact our Customer Service Department:

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.