This volume illuminates the complexity of our modern era, exploring how society can leverage exciting new opportunities whilst recognizing the complex challenges we face in a time of constant change. It helps us understand how we have come to this point and where we may be going so that we may study the opportunities and the dangers, the chances and the risks, that digital media pose in our quest for some version of «the good life».
Chapter Nine: Modeling Communication in a Research Network: Implications for the Good Networked Life
← 142 | 143 → CHAPTER NINE
Modeling Communication in a Research Network
Implications for the Good Networked Life1
DIANA MOKUNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO, CANADABARRY WELLMAN AND DIMITRINA DIMITROVAUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO, CANADA
What happens when “the good life” becomes “the networked life”? For millennia, thinkers thought they knew what the good life was: nestled in a rural or urban village, holding a single stable job preferably in supportive communion with coworkers. Although celebrated in many ways in many centuries, perhaps Thornton Wilder’s 1938 Our Town epitomized it in the 20th century: life, love, work, family, and death all in a simple village. We note that this pastoral ideal was more a sardonic myth than reality for many peasants, servants, and laborers; nevertheless, the myth still dominated (Marx, 1964). But the “triple revolution” (Rainie & Wellman, 2012) has upset the reality of pastoral village life for many—and perhaps even the myth.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.