Edited By Hua Wang
This volume illuminates the complexity of our modern era, exploring how society can leverage exciting new opportunities whilst recognizing the complex challenges we face in a time of constant change. It helps us understand how we have come to this point and where we may be going so that we may study the opportunities and the dangers, the chances and the risks, that digital media pose in our quest for some version of «the good life».
Chapter Eleven: Communicative Figurations of the Good Life: Ambivalences of the Mediatization of Homelessness and Transnational Migrant Families
← 180 | 181 → CHAPTER ELEVEN
Communicative Figurations of the Good Life
Ambivalences of the Mediatization of Homelessness and Transnational Migrant Families
ANDREAS HEPP, UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN, GERMANYPETER LUNT, UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER, UKMAREN HARTMANN, UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS BERLIN, GERMANY
The concept of “mediatization” has been the focus of considerable debate and reflection for scholars in media and communication seeking to understand an increasingly media-related world (Couldry & Hepp, 2013; Hjarvard, 2013; Lundby, 2014). In theoretical work, mediatization is defined as transformations in media and communications that relate to social and cultural change as a societal meta-process akin to individualization, urbanization, and rationalization (Hepp, 2013a; Krotz, 2009). These reflections are increasingly complemented by empirical studies investigating transformations in institutions as well as social and cultural practices on different scales over varying historical periods. This includes the longue durée of human history, the consequences of media for modernity, and the more recent emergence of a mediated network society (Jensen, 2013; Livingstone, 2009; Livingstone & Lunt, 2014).
Much of this empirical research has examined the potential for media-influenced transformations in specific domains of life often focusing on particular media. In this chapter, in contrast, we emphasize the importance of understanding mediatization in the context of complex media environments and argue that a “communicative figurations” approach (Hepp, 2013a, pp. 92–97), based on Elias’ process sociology, is a potentially useful framework to capture this understanding of mediatization. We use two examples to illustrate this...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.