Edited By Mikkel Fugl Eskjær, Stig Hjarvard and Mette Mortensen
The first part of the book, Transnational Networks, addresses the opportunities and challenges posed by transnational media to actors seeking to engage in and manage conflicts through new media platforms. The second part, Mobilising the Personal: Crossing Public and Private Boundaries, concerns the ways in which media framings of conflicts often revolve around personal aspects of public figures. The third part, Military, War, and Media, engages with a classic theme of media studies – the power relationship between media, state, and military – but in light of the mediatized condition of modern warfare, in which the media have become an integrated part of military strategies.
The book develops new theoretical arguments and a series of empirical studies that are essential reading for students and scholars interested in the complex roles of media in contemporary conflicts.
Chapter One: The Mediatization of Environmental Conflict in the ‘Network Society’
| 31 →
The Mediatization OF Environmental Conflict IN THE ‘Network Society’
This chapter examines the analytical utility of the concept of ‘mediatization’ for understanding the communication of environmental conflicts in contemporary society. A new media ecology is made up of complex, dynamic, overlapping flows, in which mainstream media frequently operate in tandem with new communication networks. Who gains media access, why, and how raises crucial questions about power relations in society and the nature of news production. Activists have long been at the forefront in using ‘new’ information technologies and digital networked communication, which enables environmental organisations to coordinate actions with increasing speed and transgressing traditional geographical boundaries. However, there is considerable variability in the extent to which environmental groups are adopting such tactical tools, and their objectives may be very different. Moreover, while this may achieve enhanced visibility, it does not necessarily subvert established structures of media and political power. Mediatization from this perspective involves recognising that what gets in the news is the product of struggles between groups with competing definitions of reality. The concept thus sheds important light on how media actively shape environmental conflict and challenger groups are forced to resort to creative tactics using new modes of communication to attempt to gain media space and symbolically counter established imbalances of power. I begin by providing an overview of the literature on ← 31 | 32 → environmental conflicts and the news, before...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.