Pedagogy of Constructive Humanistic Transformation Through Cinema
Chapter 1. Pertinent Theories
| 9 →
Cinema, subjectively—with powerful tools of fiction and nonfiction that please, transform, and deceive—shapes the public mind. In cinema there exist dramatic visual effects, synthetic dreams, counterfeit emotions, and preconceived spontaneity. Cinema has a mystique unique and different from other art forms. Can cinema be transformative? One might intuitively respond with a resounding “yes.” However, intuitive knowledge (Bergson, 1911/1998, 1965) will not be enough to gain a deep understanding of cinema, and in turn, allow the use of that understanding with a critical perspective to produce a theory about cinema.
Never before have we possessed such power to create a medium (i.e., cinema) that utilizes the human creator’s active imagination to reach into our consciousness. This is indeed a perilous terrain. Will it send us on the path of self-destruction? Would appearance be preferred to reality? Does cinema play a role in this realm? Marshall McLuhan (1967) prophesied form over content in his famous The Medium Is the Massage (cleverly misspelling message to point to his thesis). Twenty-four years later, Denzin (1991) astutely demonstrated that in postmodern cinema the language of film is without a center—that, although it may mock the past, it also lends “quasi-reverence” for the icons of the past. Cinema could easily be considered one of the pillars ← 9 | 10 → of American culture—and by extension other cultures of East and West. Cinema is a medium that speaks at once to individuals and...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.