Studies in Classicism and Romanticism: "Festschrift</I> for Dennis F. Mahoney in Celebration of his Sixty-Fifth Birthday
Edited By Wolfgang Mieder
Mahoney has taught German language, culture, literature, and film at the University of Vermont for thirty-five years, and has received national and international recognition. On campus he has been a champion of international education, advising students about studying abroad, setting up an exchange program with the University of Augsburg, and inviting students and colleagues from Germany to Vermont. He has received an Excellence in Teaching Award, an Award for Outstanding Contributions to International Education, and he was the first American to be named president of the International Novalis Society.
The title of this Festschrift captures Mahoney’s life-long occupation with this rich period of German cultural, intellectual, and literary life. The essays display his erudition and expertise on such subjects as the multifaceted Age of Goethe, including the continuing discussion of the nature of the Bildungsroman and the influence of the French Revolution. The essays deal primarily with Goethe, Schiller, and Novalis, but Gotthold Ephraim Lessing, Georg Forster, Caroline von Wolzogen, Jean Paul, E.T.A. Hoffmann, Achim von Amim, and others are discussed as well. These individual essays are representative of Mahoney’s accomplishments as a literary scholar – and a remarkable professor, colleague, and friend.
Chapter 13. The Myth of Death and Resurrection in Heinrich von Ofterdingen
| 201 →
THE MYTH OF DEATH AND RESURRECTION IN HEINRICH VON OFTERDINGEN
In his journal Europa (1803), Friedrich Schlegel interpreted Heinrich von Ofterdingen, the posthumously published novel of his friend and colleague Novalis, as the fulfillment of his criterion “daß jeder Roman nach Art eines Mährchens construirt seyn sollte” [sic] and thereby as a decisive poetic breakthrough: “den Übergang vom Roman zur Mythologie.”1 This paper will consider Ofterdingen as the attempt to create a New Mythology through the free adaptation of Christian beliefs on death and resurrection. In addition, through the comparison of Novalis’ ideas, as influenced by his reading of Goethe’s Märchen, with the depiction of Mignon’s burial in Wilhelm Meisters Lehrjahre, new light will be shed on Novalis’ relationship to Goethe as well as on the conception of his own novel.
The first section of this study will concentrate on Novalis’ soteriological view of history and poetry, which is evidenced both in the religious overtones of his Wilhelm Meister-critique and in the prevalence of “Mittlerfiguren” in his works. In the ensuing discussion of Ofterdingen, the mediating triad of Zulima, Mathilde and Cyane will be examined in the context of Novalis’ myth of death and resurrection. The concluding comparison of Goethe and Novalis will make clear why Goethe put Mignon into the sleep of death in the Lehrjahre, and why Novalis attempted to revive this figure through an adaptation of Goethe’s configuration techniques in his...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.