Part Three: The Pelagian Crisis (411–430)
Edited By Frederick Van Fleteren
Article 247: Response to Orosius
Response to Orosius
Orosius’ ardor for instruction found Augustine’s favor.1 Orosius considered it an effect of divine love. God causes us to request and seek the lights he wishes to bestow upon us. The care Orosius had for working in behalf of the Church was a gift of divine grace. Augustine responded by addressing a work to him entitled Contra Priscillianistas et Originistas. He wrote concisely and clearly but penned nearly nothing on the Priscillianist errors. Augustine was content to give Orosius his anti-Manichean writings as the principles established there applied equally to both heresies.
At the end Augustine speaks of the distinction of heavenly spirits. He speaks beautifully on these obscure and superfluous questions. He confesses he could not respond because of lack of knowledge. “I wish to confess this to you so that you who believe me to be a great teacher may learn not to esteem me as much.”2 A benefit Orosius could take from his trip to Africa could be not to place too much faith in Augustine’s public renown.3
The final part of this treatise is placed in quotation marks in the Leuven edition.4 It bears little relevance to what precedes it. In the recent edition, the editors have hesitated over its manuscript authority.5 In effect this final part is the conclusion of Letter 166. Augustine dates this treatise in 415. Since he had written it shortly after Orosius had come to Africa, we...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.