Part Three: The Pelagian Crisis (411–430)
Edited By Frederick Van Fleteren
Article 324: Appeals to Rome
Appeals to Rome
After the African bishops had so sadly concluded the Apiarius affair they sent the result together with the acts to the pope.2 The bishops indicated in no uncertain terms their displeasure over his absolution of Apiarius. They pleaded even more strongly against Faustinus. They wanted to assure themselves of papal probity and moderation and that Faustinus would no longer harass Africa. It would wound fraternal charity to act otherwise.
They spoke in detail on the subject of appeals to Rome. Zosimus had claimed the power as neighboring bishop to know the affairs of the African clergy and to receive juridically as bishop of Rome episcopal appeals. This right was founded on two canons of the Council of Sardica cited by him as from the council of Nicea. The canons of these two councils were not well distinguished in the Roman Code. The African bishops did not find these canons among the canons of the Council of Nicea. They sent a legate to consult the Eastern churches and promised the pope to cede to him the right to receive episcopal appeals until verification of the canon cited by the pope and confirmation of the canon in the acts of the Council of Nicea. If the right were not found there the African bishops would decide in council on appropriate action. As for priests as the canon of Sardica could easily be understood to concern only provincial bishops this sense could...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.