Part Three: The Pelagian Crisis (411–430)
Edited By Frederick Van Fleteren
Note 58: Dog of the Alps
Dog of the Alps
Jerome writes Pelagius was in Palestine toward 416. This statement probably indicates Pelagius was in Palestine also in 415. Jerome is silent and even at times makes mistakes. Unlike his previous letters which contain gold and wealth (auriferas), he sends letters here full of calumnies. Jerome distinguishes two persons: Ipseque mutus latrat per Alpinum canem grandem et corpulentum, et qui calcibus magis possit sauire quam dentibus: habet enim progeniem scoticae gentis de Britannorum vicinia.2 These words could refer to Pelagius as he was from Great Britain. On the other hand, by these words Jerome apparently wished to indicate Scotland. Why was Pelagius considered a dog? The words Hic tacet and so forth may be addressed to John of Jerusalem who had given Jerome every reason not to spare him his wrath. John of Jerusalem may have been continually sending presents which is the most natural sense of mittit epistulas auriferas.
Garnier believes that the dog of the Alps is Pelagius and the one who barks is Rufinus whom Jerome regards as Pelagius’ teacher.3 However Rufinus died in 410. Jerome would not say six years later hic tacet and mittit epistolas and ipse mutus latrat and the rest—these words indicate a living person. The mute may be John of Jerusalem and Pelagius his dog or the mute may be Pelagius and the dog one of his disciples.
Several capable scholars believe the dog is Caelestius because...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.