Show Less
Restricted access

Interrogating (Hi)stories

Establishing the Educational Relevance of Spiritual Development Through Critical Historiography


Audrey Lingley

In Interrogating (Hi)stories, Audrey Lingley uses a critical constructivist perspective to problematize the absence of the spiritual dimension of human growth from pedagogical models that emphasize responsiveness to developmental psychology. The book investigates this conspicuous absence through critical historiographical research; it is a critical interrogation of the tacit understandings that guide education in general and middle grades reform in particular. The author offers practical, classroom-based implications and culturally respectful language for educators who believe spirituality is a legitimate aspect of human growth and learning in a public school setting.
Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Chapter Two: Caring as Advocacy in the Middle Grades


| 23 →

Chapter Two

Caring as Advocacy in the Middle Grades

IN the field of middle grades education, pedagogical emphasis has been on designing and implementing practices referred to as developmentally appropriate for students between the ages of 10 and 15 years (e.g., Alexander, Williams, Compton, Hines, & Prescott, 1968). This emphasis is known as the middle grades concept. Among other recommendations, caring relationships that provide support and foster belonging are valued as developmentally responsive. In the most prestigious literature on the middle grades reform efforts, caring is linked with the terminology of advocacy, as in, middle grades teachers advocate for their young adolescent students through a culture of caring (NMSA, 2010).

In aligning specific practices with early adolescent developmental theory, much of the literature describes the characteristic developmental traits for the cognitive, social, emotional, psychological, physical, and moral domains (e.g., Caskey & Anfara, 2007; Roeser, Eccles, & Sameroff, 2000; Van Hoose, Strahan, & L’Esperance, 2001). In the middle grades literature, the spiritual domain of human development is not referenced. An implication of this absence is that middle grades teachers and administrators are less prepared than they could be to holistically respond to the needs, interests, and abilities of young adolescents. Given the primacy of caring as a developmentally responsive practice with middle grades students, this absence of a central affective developmental domain is striking. From a critical constructivist perspective, the omission suggests the relationship between power and knowledge construction within the field...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.