Edited By Jon F. Nussbaum
Chapter Fifteen: Sandwich Relationships: Intergenerational Communication
← 292 | 293 → CHAPTER FIFTEEN
JORDAN SOLIZ AND CRAIG FOWLER
Although we celebrate birthdays on an annual basis and our chronological age serves important legal and pragmatic purposes (e.g., determining when we can start driving and claim social security), our progression through the lifespan is marked more by the age group with which we identify (or are identified with by others) than by our chronological age. Until Erikson (1968) introduced the lifespan perspective on human development, conventional approaches to human development focused almost exclusively on the path from birth to young adulthood. We still see remnants of this thinking today evidenced by the numerous age groups that represent development in early life (e.g., infant, toddler, child, pre-teen/“tweener,” teenager, emerging adult, young adult) compared to the limited age categories beyond this life stage. As Erikson argued, human development continues across the entirety of the lifespan. Everyone experiences physiological changes as part of the aging process, and aging is often discussed in terms of these biological and physiological variations. Yet, aging across the lifespan also includes the emergence of and adaptation to different roles in personal and professional lives. Whereas younger adulthood and older adulthood have somewhat socially defined parameters, middle adulthood (also referred to as “midlife” or “middle-aged”) is more nuanced (Fingerman, Nussbaum, & Birditt, 2004).
Although there is some consensus on the age range constituting middle adulthood (40 to 60 or 65 years old), these often change depending on the lifespan position of individuals. That is,...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.