Examining Gender and Capital Punishmend
Chapter 12. Lessons from Wretched Sisters
| 295 →
· 12 ·
LESSONS FROM WRETCHED SISTERS
We return to the major question that began this book. Why these few? After giving each case detailed attention, is it possible to state that Velma Barfield, Karla Faye Tucker, Betty Lou Beets, Wanda Jean Allen, Marilyn Plantz, Lois Nadean Smith, Christina Riggs, Judias Buenoano, Lynda Block, Aileen Wuornos, Frances Newton, Teresa Lewis, Kimberly McCarthy, and Suzanne Basso were the “worst of the worst?” Were they criminals whose offenses were so heinous and whose responsibility was so clear that the world has become better since their deaths? If not, how do we explain that they were singled out for execution?
The Decision to Prosecute
The first stage of the process that puts certain offenders on the road to the death chamber is the prosecutor’s decision to charge them with a capital offense. Since Gregg v. Georgia1 the states with capital punishment have listed specific aggravating factors in their criminal laws. Prosecutors must work within those guidelines. However, as discussed earlier, the aggravating factors often include such vague descriptors as “heinous, atrocious, or cruel” allowing the state a great deal of latitude. Is it possible that some crimes are more ← 295 | 296 → heinous, more atrocious, or crueler when committed by a woman? Are they worse if the victim is a man? So it would seem. There are no statistics telling how many of the men executed since 1977 killed family members or intimate partners. But...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.