Young People’s Narratives of Disadvantage, Class, Place and Identity
1. Setting the stage: exposing the ‘grand erasure’
Our Australian colleague sociologist Raewyn Connell (2007) has very usefully sparked off a feisty debate in her Southern Theory: the Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science. To cut to the chase, the essence of Connell’s argument is that the social sciences have become totally captured by models and forms of thinking of the ‘metropole’, which is to say, the ‘rich countries’ (predominantly located in the global north), to the detriment and exclusion of other perspectives that are located on the periphery (that is say in the global ‘south’ or poorer countries) and that have a much more ‘indigenous’ or ‘local’ inflection.
Connell (2007) uses the term ‘southern theory’ for three reasons. First, she says, ‘the phrase calls attention to periphery-centre relations in the realm of knowledge’ (p. viii) and the largely invisible construal of this relationship. The intent on Connell’s part is not to present ‘a sharply bounded category of states or societies, but to emphasize relations—authority and exclusion, hegemony, partnership, sponsorship, appropriation—between intellectuals and institutions in the metropole and those in the world periphery’ (pp. viii–ix). Second, Connell (2007) is seeking to draw attention to the historical situation whereby ‘the [southern] majority of the world does produce theory’ (p. ix), but in a context of denial such that while ‘data gathering and application happen in the colony…theorizing happens [only] in the metropole’ (p. ix)—in other words, the reinforcement of yet another invisibility. Third, for Connell (2007), ‘social thought happens...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.