Young People’s Narratives of Disadvantage, Class, Place and Identity
5. Celebrating space, place and neighborhoods
← 80 | 81 → 5. Celebrating space, place and neighborhoods
In this chapter our starting point is one that is markedly at variance with the ways in which neighborhoods are usually portrayed or thought about in poor or disadvantaged areas. They are invariably regarded as ‘problem’ places that are dysfunctional and that need to be fixed. This is not to say that neighborhoods officially designated as being ‘disadvantaged’ do not have very considerable material and social issues in need of urgent attention. Our approach, however, departs significantly from official approaches that write off neighborhoods experiencing difficulties as ‘basket cases’ and that ‘red-line’ them so as to target them with ‘solutions’ to supposedly ‘fix’ the problem. We think this is a demeaning and wrong approach.
The chapter is organized into two parts. First we dissect and contest the negative construals of poor neighborhoods presented as unmitigated ‘bundles of pathologies’ (Warren, Thompson & Saegert, 2001) requiring resuscitation and in desperate need of being ‘fixed up’. Second, we proceed in the direction of developing what Wacquant (2008) refers to as some new ‘tools for rethinking…marginality’ (p. 8) based on the view that neighborhoods possess ‘rich cultural traditions and social resources that have much to offer the work of schools’ (Warren, 2005, p. 135).
Our starting point here is theoretically anchored in Lefebvre’s (1991) argument that spaces are not neutral in the sense that they are ‘thing like’ and able to be manipulated and fetishized. As Lefebvre (1991) cogently put it ← 81 | 82 → ‘space…serves as a...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.