The Drama of Reason
Chapter 7: Vision, Commerce and Society
← 180 | 181 →
Vision, Commerce and Society
It is difficult to read Hill’s comment that ‘[Pound] comes perilously close to being thought to endorse the “blitheness”, etc. that Rittenhouse associated with the Cavalier lyric’ (see last chapter) without recalling the spat that occupied the letters pages of the London Review of Books for a few months between April 1985 and February 1986. It began with Tom Paulin’s review of Peter Robinson’s collection Geoffrey Hill: Essays on his Work, in which Paulin mounted an attack on Hill’s ‘conservative imagination’, his ‘monotonously iambic’ prosody and his ‘grisly historical voyeurism’, arguing that these aesthetic features emerged from a ‘shabby and reactionary’ worldview in thrall to a belief ‘in the magical transcendence of art’.1 Hill has many times ‘come perilously close to being thought to endorse’ an archaism that could indict him as holding a ‘shabby and reactionary’ attitude, and not only by hostile critics – Anthony Thwaite’s description of Hill as a ‘runic visionary’, to cite just one example, is not meant as derogatory.2 Hill’s reading of Pound suggests a counter-argument to this conception of his work. We have seen that for Hill the canorous verse of ‘“Envoi (1919)”’, rather than constituting an uncritical endorsement of the prevailing literary ← 181 | 182 → fashions of Pound’s environment, could be read as a species of blague, a ruse that is distinguished from the derisive ironies of Homage to Sextus Propertius, but that nonetheless defies the accepted canons of taste...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.