The Case of Syria and Iraq
Edited By Lorenzo Kamel
Chapter 6: Cultural Heritage as a Process of Accumulation: The ‘Paradigm of Gilgamesh’ (Lorenzo Kamel)
Chapter 6: Cultural Heritage as a Process of Accumulation: The ‘Paradigm of Gilgamesh’
Cultural heritage is not only a relatively new idea – deeply rooted in the 19th century, when Europeans showed an increasing interest in preserving Medieval buildings – but also a problematic one. It is, in fact, a top-down ideal usually defined by the most powerful members of society. To counter this, a number of interested observers have stressed the need to democratize cultural heritage, giving greater control to local communities. This chapter contends that the ‘democratization’ of cultural heritage should be coupled, on a more theoretical level, with a process of ‘de-Westernization’ that builds on a more informed awareness about the process of ‘accumulation’ which underpins many of the achievements, ideals and perceptions that lie at the very base of much of what we commonly consider as tangible (such as works of art, artefacts, books) and intangible culture (such as knowledge, folklore, and traditions).
Some scholars have claimed that ‘Cultural heritage is a Western construct’ (Smallacombe 2000: 156), ‘a Western term’,1 and ‘a Western product linked to the birth of modernity’ (Vicente Rabanaque 2015: 95). Yet, in order to understand and/or deconstruct these claims, it is not sufficient to stick to what we commonly refer to as ‘cultural heritage’. It is indeed necessary to go back to its very roots, providing a non-Western understanding of what lies beneath and around our shared heritage.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.