Plague and Terror, Priest and Atheist
4. The Plague – Internal Corruption 53
53 CHAPTER 4 The Plague – Internal Corruption Very soon after the appearance of The Plague (La Peste), one of Camus’s most important works, Roland Barthes reviewed it in terms that Camus thought imperceptive. Barthes’s main critical point was that Camus seemed to situate his thinking ‘outside history’ – neglecting historical process. Camus wrote an open letter in reply to Barthes. The interest of this lies in the way Camus describes his own work. He says he wanted The Plague ‘to be read on a number of levels.’1 That certainly has been the case; different layers of meaning can be distinguished without necessarily contradicting one another. The book, he says, ‘has as its obvious content the struggle of the European resistance movements against Nazism’ (ibid.). To this reader, at least, it could also be seen within that broad historical con- text as an allegory for the occupation of Paris by the Nazi forces, if only because Oran is pictured as a closed, terrorised city from which it is impossible to escape. Second, he says: Compared to The Outsider, The Plague does represent […] the movement from an attitude of solitary revolt to the recognition of a community whose struggles must be shared. If there is an evolution from The Outsider to The Plague, it is towards solidarity and participation (ibid.). Third, there is the pervasive theme of separation from loved ones and allies, and its deep psychological effects. 1 Letter to Roland Barthes on The Plague. In Albert Camus: Selected Essays and Notebooks....
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.