Giambattista Tiepolo and the Rhetoric of the Altarpiece
Why has Tiepolo’s religious art often been misunderstood? How can the abbreviation and absence of key symbols in the images be explained and why is this rhetoric of absence so utterly modern? Deliberately concentrating on what is not painted, rather than what is in the picture, the book deals with Tiepolo’s lacunism as an eighteenth-century phenomenon anticipating modernity. It discusses four different forms of rhetoric: iconic, narrative, silent, and visionary. Each discourse calibrates the images within their contemporary religious and philosophical context, which promote this type of rhetoric as highly innovative.
Appendix 2 337
Appendices 337 Appendix 2 ASV, S. Alvise, B.38 (Quaderno di spese) Gennaio 1735 Per spese di Palazzo, et per l’Officio e messa della spina 42. – Spesi nell’imprimidura de quadri, doradura delle soa- ze, et colorine di Cappella 102. – Donati da D.M:a Candida Canal Abbaddessa Cechini n.100 Quali sono stati per la faccitura del quadro fatto dal Sig:or Angelo Trevisan 354. – 2 1736, as the Venetian calendar year began on 1 March.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.