A Relevance Approach to the Analysis of Research Article Introductions
4. Four Frameworks and Approaches: What Can They Tell Us? 95
4. Four Frameworks and Approaches: What Can They Tell Us? 4.1. Introduction In Chapter Three we looked at how a selection of style manuals and guides approach the five topics selected for this study. As we noted, they do not give us very many clues to understanding stylistic variation, restricting themselves to making largely prescriptive statements based on intuitions or implicit theories which are themselves in need of clarification. Although these manuals give some useful pointers, it seems safe to conclude that explicit teaching – as represented in the style guides – is not the cause of the stylistic differences with which we are concerned, and does not even reflect them very closely. It is time to look more directly at some theoretical frameworks that writing scholars have used to approach argumentative texts. This is the aim of Chapter Four: to explore to what extent four widely used models can help to provide functional explanations for stylistic choices and what areas remain in need of alternative explanations. The phenomena with which we are concerned (variation in paragraph structure, sentence length and information structure; choices of vocabulary and register) are of course identifiable and describable in both English and Italian academic writing. In addition, both types of writing belong to a common tradition – that of Western argumentative writing (Connor 1996: 64). The challenge is thus to explain how writers, while doing such apparently similar sorts of things in the two languages, manage to produce such different effects. A useful starting point is Evangelisti’s...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.