4. Cosmopolitan Hermeneutics in the Age of the “Clash of Civilizations” 65
65 4. Cosmopolitan Hermeneutics in the Age of the “Clash of Civilizations” In the Introduction I have already mentioned Jean Grondin’s significant observation that Gadamer’s recognition of the “dimension of world-historical importance” of the “hermeneutic openness to the other” brought him, especially in the 1980s and 1990s, “to an almost ‘political’ or cosmopolitan broadening of his hermeneutics”, which he developed “mostly in lectures, […] as well as in the numerous inter- views on questions of the moment”, where “he appears alarmed by the consequences of the Industrial Revolution”1. Now, it is surely interesting to notice that Gadamer’s attention to what I have previously defined the pathologies of the industrial world also led him to point out how the Western bureaucratic and “levelling” socio- political model, during the last centuries, somehow expanded to the whole world. With regard to this phenomenon, Gadamer explicitly speaks of an “epoch of the new Oikoumene”2, or even of a new and more sophisticated kind of “intellectual colonialism (geistiger Koloni- alismus)”3 that could eventually lead to the establishment of a stand- ardized global civilization. So, in the 1989 essay Heidegger und das Ende der Philosophie we read: Brought into being by the West, […] our civilization […] has nevertheless spread its net over the greater part of the world. It concerns the world view which lies at the root of science and scientific theorizing, a world view which is characteristic of our epoch. […] Contemporary civilization strives this destiny, or so it seems, a destiny which will...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.