6. On the Problematic Character of Ethic and Aesthetic Experiences in the Age of Science 91
91 6. On the Problematic Character of Ethic and Aesthetic Experiences in the Age of Science In the previous chapters we have mostly dealt with moral and political questions, and I think it has been shown how, from a Gadamerian point of view, one might speak of a problematic character of ethic experience in our age. As a matter of fact, since the end of the nine- teenth century we have probably been living in an unprecedented epoch of moral crisis. An epoch characterized by a “situation of disorientation arisen when the traditional ideals and values failed”: that is, when the “traditional orientation points were eroded by the disenchantment of the world”, and the “techno-scientific rational- ization produced […] the polytheism of values and the equipollence of decisions”1. In a word, an epoch that has violently thrown us “into the shadow of nihilism (im Schatten des Nihilismus)”2. According to Gadamer, nihilism, “relativism, historicism [and] fragmentarism” represent indeed “the undeniable principles of our own world-situation (die unleugbaren Grundzüge unserer eigenen Weltsituation)”3. Given all this, it is not by accident that Gadamer devoted many observations to moral and political questions, including the dismissal of those ethic concepts he felt unsatisfactory, and the consequent revaluation of those he felt were instead satisfactory and successful. Among the first ones, I think one might mention Kant’s philosophy of practical reason and the phenomenological value-ethics of Max 1 Volpi 2005, pp. 4 and 175. On this topic, see also Volpi 2000. 2 To...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.