4 Final elision: evidence from spontaneous and elicited speech 183
183 Chapter 4 Final elision: evidence from spontaneous and elicited speech 4.1 Introduction The two previous chapters presented elision in determiners and proclitics in Florentine Italian, building on evidence found in a corpus of Tuscan Italian (Chapter 2) and results from a production experiment in Florence (Chapter 3). The results of the corpus study may be said to be representative of spontaneous (formal and informal) speech, whereas those of the production experiment are representative of elicited speech. As has often been noted in the linguistic literature (e.g., Vaux & Cooper, 1999; Newman & Ratliff, 2001), despite the fact that both text collection of naturally occurring speech and its direct elicitation are powerful tools to analyze linguistic phenomena, much can be missed if only one tool is used exclusively. Hence, even though corpus studies enable the researchers to gain initial impressions about the occurrence of a phenomenon, corpus studies often do not allow researchers to verify all their hypotheses because certain important instances or contexts rarely appear in spontaneous speech. Thus, I decided to combine corpus and elicited data (cf. also Cabré & Prieto, 2005; Dehé, 2008; Campany, 2008). In line with these deliberations, it is desirable to establish the possible differences and similarities between elision in spontaneous and elicited speech and to examine the pooled data to get a deeper understanding of final elision. This chapter compares the data of the corpus study and those collected during the production experiment and discusses their pooled results. The chapter is structured as follows. Section 4.2...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.