A Text-Oriented Study of Placement Practices
7. Roles and Identities in Placement Practices 185
185 7 Roles and Identities in Placement Practices Identity in practice is defined socially not merely because it is reified in social discourse of the self and of social categories, but also because it is produced as a lived experience of participation in specific communities. (Wenger 1998: 151) After analysing genre-based practices and expert-novice interactions via feedback, this chapter intends to articulate the relationship between roles and identities in placement. I have started with an epigraph from Wenger (1998) with a view to highlighting the theoretical position taken on board in this chapter that identity in practice ties in with our participation in the social world and our representation of self in the course of reifying the practice. For decades, the question of ‘who am I?’ has been triggering discussions from various epistemological standpoints as the concept of identity spans fields as diverse as philosophy, social psychology, business, linguistics, to name just a few. In linguistics, for example, recent research on the negotiation of authorial presence has centred around the analysis of the choices of personal pronouns (e.g., Kuo 1998) and self-mentioning (e.g., Hyland 2001; Tang/John 1999), clustering mostly at the thematic positions of the discourse. The presence of ‘I’ in relation to ‘others’ is crucial to the understanding of the socio-political shaping of a written work as the positioning of oneself is often a matter of negotiation of authority and cultural capital available (Wardle 2004). Despite the popularity of the term identity in linguistic research, the construct of...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.