A Pragmatic and Semantic Study
3. Approach to the Study 45
45 3. Approach to the Study Given the extensive distribution and complex behaviour of particle a as reflected by the reviewed literature, it is assumed that the particle can be put to a variety of uses in a wide range of situations. In sharing the position asserted by Goddard (1998: 6) that ‘the meaning of a word is the main determinant of its use’, it is also assumed that all the uses of the particle should be tied to its fundamental meaning or meanings. This study seeks to capture the whole range of the particle’s uses and the meaning or meanings that underlie its uses. In Section 3.1 of this chapter, considerations of conceptual and methodological issues will be address- ed. Section 3.2 will discuss the corpus data used and the last two sections will describe the analytical procedures and the procedures for presenting the results. 3.1 Preliminary considerations 3.1.1 Conceptual framework of modality Modality in languages has been an important part of linguistic study and description. It is the focus of the linguistic works by Perkins (1983), Palmer (1986), Maynard (1993), Bybee and Fleischman (eds. 1995), and Hoye (1997). Discussions of modality also feature prominently in major linguistictic works such as Lyons (1977), Saeed (1997), Goddard (1998), Huddleston and Pullum et al. (2002). Modality is defined in very general terms by Lyons (1977: 452) as ‘his [the speaker’s] opinion or attitude towards the proposition that the sentence expresses or the situation that the proposition describes’. This view is generally...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.