Show Less

Mittlere Deutsche Literatur und Italien

Beiträge zu Ehren von Emilio Bonfatti

Series:

Edited By Federica Masiero

Dieser Band versammelt Beiträge zu Ehren von Emilio Bonfatti (*Mirandola 1942, † Padova 2007), der von 1982 bis 2007 den Lehrstuhl für Deutsche Philologie an der Universität Padua innehatte. Emilio Bonfatti war einer der wichtigsten Repräsentanten der italienischen Forschung zur Mittleren Deutschen Literatur (1400−1750), dessen Arbeiten im In- und Ausland hohes Ansehen genießen. Freunde, Kollegen und Schüler beleuchten verschiedene Themen seines Forschungsgebietes. Im Mittelpunkt stehen die Bereiche, denen sein besonderes Interesse galt: die deutschsprachige Rezeptionsliteratur mit italienischen Vorlagen und die kulturellen Wechselbeziehungen zwischen Deutschland und Italien in der Frühen Neuzeit. Es finden sich zudem Beiträge zur originalen deutschen Literatur jener Zeit und zur deutschsprachigen Rezeptionsliteratur mit Vorlagen aus anderen Ländern. Der Band umfasst vierzehn Beiträge und eine Darstellung der wissenschaftlichen Tätigkeit von Emilio Bonfatti. Ein Verzeichnis der Schriften des Geehrten schließt das Werk ab.

Prices

Show Summary Details
Restricted access

MARIA GRAZIA SAIBENE Arigo’s Decameron: the Novella of Ghismunda 55

Extract

55 MARIA GRAZIA SAIBENE (Pavia) Arigo’s Decameron: the novella of Ghismunda 1. Introduction The novella of Ghismunda spread throughout Germany in the second half of the fifteenth century thanks to some translations. Leonardo Bruni’s Latin version of the novella was translated by Niclas von Wyle, who incorporated it in his Translationen,1 and was re-elaborated by Albrecht von Eyb in Ehebüchlein.2 The interest raised by this novella depends in particular on the themes of love and the social position of women. In comparison with the single versions of the novella, Arigo’s translation of Ghismunda, which is part of his Decameron,3 presents different features. First of all, he trans- lated from the original source, Decamerone; therefore, in comparison with the translators who used Bruni’s Latin version, Arigo had to solve more complex issues as regards to the language, style and syntax. Moreover, in Arigo’s Decameron, the original, narrative frame is maintained, and the novella of Ghismunda is linked with the introduction to the Day 4. There, Boccaccio defends himself from previously received criticism and provides a demonstration of the power of nature against reason, which is a central theme also throughout the novella of Ghismunda. As a result, if on the one hand we can hypothesize that such translations were intended mainly for noblemen – in particular for noblewomen – (cf. par. 2), on the other hand, the aims of the translators appear different. While the single versions of Ghismunda pursue moral and didactic intentions by giving examples of behaviour, the...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.