Show Less
Restricted access

Hybrid Identities

Series:

Edited By Flocel Sabaté

This book dissiminates a selected collection of research texts from the Congress Hybrid Identities, held in 2011 in the Institute for Research into Identities and Society (University of Lleida, Catalonia, Spain). Outstanding researchers from Social and Humanities fields adapted the hybridization of society such as a new perspective in order to study and understand the evolution of conviviality from the Middle Ages to current days throughout a comparative space and time. Taking the concept from the anthropology, the hybridization became a new approach for social studies and Humanities. Hybridization offers a historical perspective in order to renew perspectives for study different societies during all historical periods since Middle Ages to current days. At the same time, hybridization appears as a tool for analysing social realities in the different continents of the word. In any case, it is a new way in order to understand how the societies reaches its respective cohesions throughout mixted identities.
Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Hybrid Identities: the Case of Medieval Spain

Extract

Adeline RUCQUOI

Centre de Recherches Historiques – École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales

Historians are the product of their time, and great historical topics are closely linked to the contexts in which they are created. These include both personal experiences and the social, political and cultural contexts in which historical works are elaborated.1 Identity is one of the issues that have recently emerged in the field of medieval history. What is identity? The Webster’s Dictionary defines the word as “The condition or fact of being the same or exactly alike” as its first entry. The same definition was given by Medieval Latin authors: actio quaevis repetita, allowing the author of the Miracula S. Adalberti Egmundani to say in chapter 11: Identitas satietatis mater est. Identitas as a repetition of the same leads to boredom or discouragement, to acedia, a capital sin. Although identity, as we understand it, does not seem to be a medieval concept, at the end of the thirteenth century idemptitas appears as synonymous of aequalitas, parilitas.2

The current sense of the word dates back to the nineteenth century and emerged within the fields of psychology and sociology as both the individual construction of the self and the set of features that distinguish an individual or a collectivity from the others. The “social identity” comes from markers, such as language, age, dress, behaviour, race, that allow individuals to be divided into distinct, easily recognizable groups, a classification not always conscious.3 This concept...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.