Edited By Emmanuelle Labeau and Jacques Bres
Emmanuelle LABEAU & Jacques BRES Introduction 1
Introduction Emmanuelle LABEAU, Aston University & Jacques BRES, Praxiling, UMR 5267 CNRS-Montpellier III For structuralism, a language constitutes a neat system of interrelated units defined by the oppositions into which they enter. Yet this is easily contra- dicted by linguistic evidence. Indeed, it is not unusual to find grammatical morphemes (or grams) from different periods and sources overlapping in their functions (Hopper 1991: 22): Within a broad functional domain, new layers are continually emerging. As this hap- pens, the older layers are not necessarily discarded, but may remain to coexist with and interact with the newer layers. The focus of this book is the verbal domain. In the wake of Bybee’s (1985, 1994) and Dahl’s (1985) studies, it advocates the benefits of adopting a cross-linguistic and diachronic approach to the study of linguistic phenom- ena. Within the scope of the Romance family, similar cross-linguistic evolu- tion paths will be explored as related languages may be at different stages of grammaticalisation, and development featured in one language may shed light on what is happening in another. For instance, an analysis of parallel corpora in French and Italian (Rebotier) that are at different stages in the evolution of perfect into past provides useful information on potential substitutes for the declining French past historic and may point towards likely developments in Italian. Similarly, a discussion of temporal phrases including the verb to have to indicate retrospective time measurement from an anchor point for Portuguese (Moia) in comparison with other languages may point towards potential...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.