Edited By Mónica García-Salmones and Pamela Slotte
EPILOGUE: The Cosmopolitical and the National. An Uneasy Relationship (Bo STRÅTH)
201 EPILOGUE The Cosmopolitical and the National An Uneasy Relationship Bo STRÅTH 1. The Ambiguities of the Concept and the Failure to Address the Social Question Cosmopolitan is derived from the Greek words cosmos and polis. Cosmos refers to the whole world, yes, indeed, the whole universe, although in practice the reference is to the world as the globe. Polis is the label of a bounded political community, normally a small city state. From there comes the term politics. Since the nineteenth century, the locus of the political is in Europe in particular the nation state. The unification of the unbounded world and the bounded polity means an ambiguous relationship and a crucial question is how the ambiguity has been addressed historically. The ambiguity has been present in the historical discourses on cos- mopolitanism since the eighteenth century. The cosmopolite has been seen as a citizen of the world transcending political territorial borders such as nation states and living in a vaguely discerned world state. The cosmopolite was imagined as standing above or between all bounded polities. At the same time the term had a local demarcation. The unbounded cosmopolity did only make sense in relation to the bounded (national or local) polity. Global went hand in hand with local. In the nineteenth century German debate, for instance, the cosmopol- itan imagination was based on the idea of the nation state. Immanuel Kant’s point that world government was a world federation of states, rather than something that transcended them,...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.