Show Less
Restricted access

Contextualizing World Literature

Series:

Edited By Jean Bessière and Gerald Gillespie

This book revisits the notion of World Literature and its applications in Comparative Literature. It suggests the notion not as a means to sift out international paradigms for reading literatures, but as a set of guidelines for the construction of interlocking and/or reciprocally illuminating multilingual literary clusters. These ensembles are of very diverse shapes: the world, a region, a country, a language block, a network of cross-cultural «interferences» – while the so-called minor literatures invite to question the use of these ensembles. Within this frame, fourteen essays respond to the basic paradox of World Literature: how may specific methodological and critical outlooks allow expression of the universal? The answers to this question can be arranged in three groups: 1. Recognition of the need to break loose from European or Western critical perspectives; 2. Presentation of macro- and microcosmic dimensions connectedness and its processes; 3. Definitions of the methodological efforts and hermeneutic orientations to be applied.
Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Goethe, China, and World Literature

Extract



Steven SONDRUP

Brigham Young University

Even before the expression World Literature – or even the widely used German term Weltliteratur – came to designate a new direction in literary studies, the latter was an expression with a rather vague meaning for most students of literature. Those with a particular focus on German literature of the eighteenth and nineteenth century associated it with Goethe and the breadth of his literary creativity and intellectual stature. It is, however, not an expression that Goethe coined, but he is unquestionably the figure who made it a prominent term in literary scholarship (D’haen 6-9). Because Goethe used the term on various occasions and in a wide variety of contexts, it is difficult to understand exactly what he meant by the word whose coming importance he may have suspected and certainly would have vigorously advocated. My intention is not to offer yet another exposition of the various broad conceptions he may have entertained with regard to the expression, but rather to discuss the role it played in conjunction with another aspect of his cultural and literary-critical background in the development of one aspect of his shifting sense of the term and its reflection in modern literary analysis.

Even outside any particular context, what seems clear to anyone encountering the expression is that it denotes an amiable and encompassing engagement with literature. At the time Weltliteratur had become a relatively frequent term in Goethe’s critical vocabulary, the established nations as well...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.