How States Behave in a New Institutional Context of Negotiation
Chapter IV. The structure and composition of the European Convention
| 127 →
The structure and composition of the European Convention
Since the Treaty of Maastricht the EU has undergone a continuous period of institutional reforms that ended with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty in December 2009. Supranational institutions as well as national parliaments have increasingly claimed the right to be involved in the process by taking part directly in the IGCs or indirectly by contributing to the reflection groups in charge of formulating proposals for institutional reforms1. Hence the European Convention was a significant response to the need to further democratise2 the long-lasting process of treaty reform by involving a wider spectrum of political actors such as the European Parliament, the Commission, and the National Parliaments that were usually left aside. The idea lying at the heart of the project, especially in the governments’ eye, was the hope that the institutional design of the new negotiation setting would allow more ambitious and innovative results avoiding the rigidity and inefficiency of the previous IGCs3. A more open, inclusive and transparent process was meant to be the remedy to the classic “lowest common denominator” outcomes produced by the previous IGCs. The structural differences of the European Convention process were expected to produce a more discursive setting4, able to reduce the transaction costs5 linked to the complex issues under negotiations such as a renewed institutional architecture. According to these premises, ← 127 | 128 → the aim of this part of the research...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.