Show Less
Restricted access

Activation Policies for the Unemployed, the Right to Work and the Duty to Work


Edited By Elise Dermine and Daniel Dumont

Since the 1990s and the 2000s, Western social protection systems have experienced a turn towards activation. This turn consists of the multiplication of measures aimed at bringing those who are unemployed closer to participation in the labour market. These measures often induce a strengthening of the conditions that must be met in order to receive social benefits.
It is in this well known context that the authors gathered in this book decided to take a closer look at the relationship between activation policies for the unemployed and the right and the duty to work. If activation measures are likely to increase transitions towards the labour market, we can also make the assumption that they may, particularly when they are marked with the seal of coercion, hinder or dramatically reduce the right to freely chosen work. In such circumstances, the realisation of the «right to work», which is often stated to be the aim of those who promote activation, tends in practice to be reduced to an increasing pressure being exerted on the unemployed. In this case, isn’t it actually the duty to work that is particularly reinforced?
After an historical and philosophical perspective on the issue, this assumption is confronted with the developments observed in the United States and in France, and then with the guidelines laid down in international human rights instruments. What follows is a discussion of two alternatives to the dominant activation model: the basic income guarantee and the employment guarantee.
Show Summary Details
Restricted access



Activation Policies for the Unemployed: Redefining a Human Rights Response


The activation of employment policies that has developed in a wide range of OECD countries since the mid-nineties consists in coupling unemployment benefits and social assistance with certain services or requirements to improve one’s “employability” by going through training, requalification, or work experience. Elise Dermine and Daniel Dumont, the editors of this volume, chose to frame the debate on the thus understood spread of activation by putting forward three theses. First, they note, activation per se is not necessarily to be denounced as a “recommodification” of work or social protection. In modern societies, work is not simply a constraint imposed upon individuals to achieve a decent standard of living; as Fernand Tanghe reminds us in his contribution, it is also, and simultaneously, a means of social integration and of personal fulfilment. Therefore, insofar as activation policies seek to strengthen individuals’ abilities to join the employment market and access decent work, they may be seen potentially as progress towards the full realisation of the right to work.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.