Negotiating Texts and Contexts in Contemporary Irish Studies
Chapter Five The Return and Redefinition of the Repressed: Postcolonial Studies and ‘Eveline’ in Dubliners 81
Chapter Five The Return and Redefinition of the Repressed: Postcolonial Studies and ‘Eveline’ in Dubliners That postcolonial studies has become a seminal part of academic life is now beyond debate. Indeed, the very term ‘postcolonial’ has become the latest ‘catchall term’ to ‘dazzle the academic mind’ ( Jacoby 1995, 30) by becoming part of the ‘intellectual/academic industry taking as its topic the colonial division of the world’ (Smyth 1995, 27). At an epistemological level, however, there has been considerable debate as to the epistemological status of postcolonialism: such has been the elasticity of the concept postcolonial that in recent years some com- mentators have begun to express anxiety that there may be a danger of it imploding as an analytic concept with any real cutting edge. (Moore-Gilbert 1997, 11) A further level of complexity is introduced into this debate when the matter of Ireland is considered. Luke Gibbons has speculated that the problem with Ireland and postcolonial studies is simply that ‘a native population which happened to be white was an affront to the very idea of “white man’s burden”, and threw into disarray some of the constitutive categories of colonial discourse’ (Gibbons 1996, 149). However, academic opinion has diverged considerably on this issue. There has been ongoing debate about this topic within the academy, with some theorists, notably Bill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffiths and Helen Tiffin in The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures and in The Post-Colonial Studies Reader, arguing that Ireland was complicit in the colonising...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.