Conclusion Objectives and key conclusions As set out in the introductory chapter, this study aimed to establish the empirical basis of the provision of poor relief in the period; to chart and explain regional variations in poor relief; to examine issues which highlight political and social class struggles; and to consider the broader role of the poor law and the boards of guardians in local politics and community. As discussed in the introduction, there has been only limited study of poor relief in the period from 1850 to 1914. This study, therefore, breaks new ground: first, in providing a detailed analysis of trends in poor relief and, second, echoing the UK historiography, in highlighting the regional variations which occurred in Ireland. This allows an analysis of the fac- tors going to explain dif ferent levels of poor relief. Third, developing on the work of authors such as Feingold and Crossman, this study examines the relevance of political and social class struggle to the provision of poor relief. The research strongly supports Feingold’s thesis as to the take-over of the poor law boards by Nationalist guardians in the period from the late 1870s-early 1880s. However, it emphasises the point that poor law boards were rarely (if ever) simply administrators of poor relief and that broader political and social questions were seldom absent from the minds of the boards of guardians. It also questions the assumption that the take-over of power by Nationalist guardians led to significant changes in poor law policy,...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.