Show Less


Studies in French and Francophone Culture


Edited By Neil Archer and Andreea Weisl-Shaw

Originating in the conference held at the University of Cambridge in 2009, this collection of essays includes a range of innovative papers from across the diverse field of French and Francophone studies. From medieval texts to the dramatization of the novel, from postcolonial writing to the politics of film and the bande dessinée, the articles in this collection draw on recent developments in the theories of adaptation, translation, and cultural and textual transition. In keeping with these developments, they move the notion of adaptation away from questions of authenticity and fidelity, thinking instead about the movement across texts and time, and the way such movement generates new meanings. Offering insightful approaches to its subjects of study, the book is an engaging contribution to this growing area of research.


Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Part 5 Performance, Adaptation and Subjectivity 177


Part 5 Performance, Adaptation and Subjectivity Ruth Morris Madame Bovary: A Catastrophist Reading of Adaptation Adaptation, a key term in Darwin’s Origin of Species (1859), has been vari- ously read as a pivotal theme in contemporary literature. However, what has often been overlooked is a consideration of the literary impact or oth- erwise that evolutionary or transformist ideas had in France.1 Transform- ist thinkers such as Jean-Baptiste Lamarck and Geof froy Saint-Hilaire either preceded Darwin, or were met with a hostile reception in France by inf luential scientific savants such as Georges Cuvier.2 This paper will read a French literary text published before Darwin’s book, Gustave Flaubert’s Madame Bovary (1857), as engaging with cata- strophist notions of adaptation, or more accurately non-adaptation. Flau- bert was writing Madame Bovary in a France which was scientifically very dif ferent from 1860s England. The French palaeontologist Georges Cuvier formulated the catastrophist model as a means of explaining the origins of the world. In this model, the world is divided into very discrete time periods which are punctuated by vast catastrophes – or, in Cuverian terminology, ‘revolutions’ – that have eradicated life. His principal work Discours sur les revolutions de la surface du globe brought together his theory and was first 1 To avoid any anachronisms, I shall be using the term ‘transformism’ rather than ‘evolution’. In the nineteenth century, ‘evolution’ primarily referred to the process of development from an embryo to an adult rather than the connotations of ancestry and descent which it has today....

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.