Show Less

Developing Criticality in Practice Through Foreign Language Education


Stephanie Houghton and Etsuko Yamada

Many universities have adopted criticality as a general aim of higher education, in order to meet the demands of an increasingly globalised world. But what is criticality, and how does it develop in practice? This book explores the concept in detail and considers how it can be systematically developed in practical ways through foreign language education.
Taking a practice-first rather than a theory-first approach, the book presents two case studies based on action research in order to investigate criticality development through foreign language education. One study was conducted in beginner level Japanese language classes at a British university by a Japanese teacher-researcher, and the other was conducted in upper-intermediate English language classes at a Japanese university by a British teacher-researcher. The two studies illuminate the complex experiences of students and teachers as criticality starts to develop in both planned and unplanned ways, from beginner-level to more advanced levels of foreign language learning. The authors also suggest a range of practical teaching approaches which can be used to develop criticality through targeted instruction.


Show Summary Details
Restricted access

Bibliography 177


Bibliography Anderson, L.W. and Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman. BBC News (2007). ‘Boom in Critical Thinking A-level’, BBC Online, 16 August 2007. accessed 13 September 2011. Barnett, R. (1997). Higher Education: A Critical Business. Buckingham: Open University Press. Bennett, M. (1993). ‘Towards Ethnorelativism: A Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity’. In R. Paige (ed.), Education for the Intercultural Experience, pp. 21–72. Yarmouth, Maine: Intercultural Press. Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W. and Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. New York; Toronto: Longmans, Green. Bredella, L. and Richter, A. (2004). ‘Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis’. In M. Byram (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Language Teaching and Learning, pp. 522–524. London; New York: Routledge. Brislin, R.(1981). Cross-Cultural Encounters: Face to Face Interactions. New York: Pergamon. Brown, K. (2000). ‘Conclusion: Creative Thinking About a New Modern Languages Pedagogy’, In S. Green (ed.), New Perspectives on Teaching and Learning Modern Languages, pp. 183–194. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters. Brumfit, C., Myles, F., Mitchell, R., Johnston, B. and Ford, P. (2005). ‘Language Study in Higher Education and the Development of Criticality’, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 145–168. Burbules, N.C. and Berk, R. (1999). ‘Critical Thinking and Critical Pedagogy: Relations, Dif ferences, and Limits’. In T.S. Popkewitz and L. Fendler (eds), Critical Theories in Education. Changing Terrains of Knowledge and Politics, pp. 45–66. New York: Routledge. Byram, M. (1989). Cultural...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.

Do you have any questions? Contact us.

Or login to access all content.