Studies in a Literary Genre
APPENDIX - JOANNA RUSS Untitled Review (1971)
APPENDIX – JOANNA RUSS Untitled Review (1971) Originally published in College English 33, No. 3 (Dec., 1971): 368–71. Copyright 1971 by the National Council of Teachers of English. Reprinted with permission. Science fiction is receiving more academic attention than it used to, a spe- cies of kindness that may turn out to be the equivalent of being nibbled to death by ducks. For reasons nobody seems to understand, voyages to the moon fascinate academicians, as does anything written before 1800, or satire, or Utopian fiction—in short, anything that avoids the fecundity and speculative wildness of twentieth-century science fiction. It is prob- ably a question of what’s manageable, but unfortunately voyages to the moon tend to be the oldest (often the dullest) kind of science fiction, and Utopian romances are not only secondary in the contemporary oeuvre, they are relatively unimportant. Robert C. Elliott’s The Shape of Utopia is a scattered collection of pleasant, modest, clearly written essays, none of which treats its subject with any complexity. There is much in the book that is just, much that turns into truism if you look at it twice, and not really enough to tie the essays together into one volume. Much is stated without being explored or fully described; much is mentioned or proposed without being done. For example, Elliott twice brings up a rather important topic—what’s the relation of the teller of these tales to the author, of More to “More” (in More’s Utopia), or Coverdale to Hawthorne (Blithedale...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
This site requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals.
Do you have any questions? Contact us.Or login to access all content.